← All evidence records

HU-R005 / v1 / independent benchmark

Unitree G1 EDU-4 × Fraunhofer IPA

Independently measured

The first independently measured record in HumanoidUptime: a specified G1 configuration tested for energy use, movement, stability, safety, security and industrial suitability.

Controlled laboratory benchmarkStuttgart, GermanySingle-unit testFirst published 2026-09-03Last modified 2026-09-04Evidence reviewed 2026-09-04
1:49 hderived typical-scenario endurance
239 Wmean scenario power
>500 Nreported collision force

Evidence verdict

Established. Claimed. Unknown.

EstablishedOperator or independent evidence
ClaimedManufacturer or capability claim

No separate manufacturer-only claim is material to this record.

Still unknownNo qualifying public value
  • Total benchmark hours, repeat counts and uncertainty
  • Failure and human intervention rate
  • MTBF and MTTR
  • Availability in a scheduled field deployment

Audit conclusion

Fraunhofer publishes useful measurements that reveal concrete operating constraints, including scenario-based power draw, derived per-charge endurance, actuator overheating and collision force. The controlled single-unit benchmark does not establish field availability, failure frequency, intervention rate or repair time, and the public material does not report repeat counts or uncertainty for most tests.

01 / Disclosure

The public reliability record

Runtime hours Not disclosed: Total test hours not disclosed
Availability / uptime Not disclosed: Not measured
Human interventions Not disclosed: Not disclosed
MTBF Not disclosed: Not measured
MTTR Not disclosed: Not measured
Task output Not disclosed: No production task
Energy / charging Independently measured: 1:49 scenario / 239 W
Autonomy mode Independently measured: Teleoperated baseline
Fleet size Independently measured: 1 test unit
Independently measured Operator corroborated Manufacturer reported Capability claim Not disclosed

02 / Claims audit

Claim by claim

Test configuration Independently measured

G1 EDU-4, Dex3-1 three-finger hands, firmware 1.04

Fraunhofer identifies the tested configuration and states that the unit was delivered in May 2025; results should not be generalized to other variants or firmware versions without qualification.

Sources: ipa-benchmark-press, ipa-benchmark-detail
Energy and endurance Independently measured

239 W mean power and 1:49 h derived per-charge endurance in the defined typical scenario

Fraunhofer measures power in standardized standing and walking conditions and derives maximum operating times from those results. The 1:49 figure is not presented as an observed continuous field run or cumulative runtime. Fraunhofer also reports 154 W standing, 272 W level walking, 283 W at 10% incline and a derived 2:49 h for standing only.

Sources: ipa-benchmark-detail
Walking speed Independently measured

0.49 m/s slow and 0.84 m/s fast walking measured with 3D tracking

A 3 kg load did not reduce steady walking speed in the described test, but increased acceleration and deceleration time by several tenths of a second.

Sources: ipa-benchmark-detail
Thermal constraint Independently measured

Outstretched arms could shut down after one to two minutes without added payload

Fraunhofer attributes the shutdown and dropping arms to actuator overheating. No frequency across repeated trials or recovery time is published.

Sources: ipa-benchmark-detail
Collision force Independently measured

Mean peak forces of approximately 510 N at the chest and 530 N at the abdomen in specified walking collisions

Fraunhofer's public safety guide states that displayed values are mean peak forces from at least three trials per scenario with the robot in fast mode at about 1 m/s. It does not publish the underlying observations, spread or unit-to-unit variation.

Sources: ipa-safety-guide-2025, ipa-safety-2026, ipa-benchmark-press
Stability and recovery Independently measured

No balance loss on cable-channel steps or a 20% ramp; recovery depended on floor friction

Self-stabilization was strong in the described tests, while standing up from the back failed on smooth tile and wood because the arms could slip.

Sources: ipa-benchmark-detail
Cybersecurity Independently measured

Bluetooth remote-code-execution vulnerability found in the tested software state

Fraunhofer reports that the vulnerability persisted across several firmware updates and was subsequently closed by a newer update.

Sources: ipa-benchmark-press, ipa-benchmark-detail
Delivered autonomy Independently measured

Remote-controlled walking available after delivery; further capabilities require user implementation

This is the observed baseline of the tested EDU configuration, not a claim about every later software stack built on the platform.

Sources: ipa-benchmark-detail

03 / Timeline

What changed, and when

  1. Test unit delivered

    Fraunhofer identifies the test platform as a G1 EDU-4 delivered in May 2025 with Dex3-1 hands and firmware 1.04.

    ipa-benchmark-press, ipa-benchmark-detail
  2. Safety findings described

    Fraunhofer discusses collision-force testing of the G1 and the implications for operation near people.

    ipa-safety-2026
  3. Standardized benchmark announced

    Fraunhofer publishes the benchmark framework and selected G1 results across six test categories.

    ipa-benchmark-press
  4. Detailed measurements published

    The extended account adds energy, speed, stability, thermal, cleanliness and cybersecurity observations.

    ipa-benchmark-detail
  5. HumanoidUptime evidence review

    Energy results were marked as scenario-derived endurance and collision-test repeat information was added from Fraunhofer's public safety guide.

    ipa-benchmark-press, ipa-benchmark-detail, ipa-safety-guide-2025, ipa-safety-2026

04 / Source ledger

Review the evidence

  1. ipa-safety-guide-2025Independent research institute

    Leitfaden: Funktionale Sicherheit humanoider Roboter ↗

    Fraunhofer IPA · Published 2025-10-25 · Accessed 2026-09-04

  2. ipa-safety-2026Independent research institute

    Humanoide Roboter – Status quo, Potenziale und Forschungstätigkeiten (Teil 3 von 3) ↗

    Fraunhofer IPA · Published 2026-02-12 · Accessed 2026-09-04

  3. ipa-benchmark-pressIndependent research institute

    Fraunhofer IPA develops standardized analyses for application-relevant criteria of humanoid robots ↗

    Fraunhofer IPA · Published 2026-05-27 · Accessed 2026-09-04

  4. ipa-benchmark-detailIndependent research institute

    Humanoide Roboter: Standardisierte Analysen für anwendungsrelevante Kriterien ↗

    Fraunhofer IPA · Published 2026-06-03 · Accessed 2026-09-04

Last editorial review2026-09-04

Found something newer or more precise?

Submit evidence